11 Years Factory wholesale Modular Belts P=1″ Belt Har 1005 rolling ball for Philadelphia Factories

Har 1005 rolling ball    

Thickness: 27.2mm

Our company has been qualified with ISO 9001:2000 quality system. The product strictly complies with the standard and procedures of ISO 9001, which ensures good product quality. So our products have some advantages, for example:

1. Easy installation and maintenance
2. High mechanical strength and wear resistance
3. Low friction coefficient
4. Excellent product handling
5. High performance

We are a leading manufacturer of modular belts with professional team; we can provide you with excellent quality items. This kind of modular belt can be used in the following industries:
Beverage industry such as acceleration, depletive and accumulation.
Food industry such as cool off lines and pack lines.
Meat industry such as tray pack line and metal detectors.
Our products are mainly used in bakery industry including dough transport, cooling lines, internal transport, metal detectors and packaging lines
Seafood applications including tray packing lines
spiral applications as proofing and freezing of croissants, cooling and resting
Bakery applications including raw dough handling, cooling lines and packing lines
Fruit vegetable applications including elevators, inspection tables and packaging lines.

Roller Conveyor shot blasting machine webside:www.joint-machinery.com
This is David from Joint Inc,China. We are leading manufacturer of shot blasting machines and selling shot blasting machines to more than 20 countries.
Both the small distributor in Vietnam and the big group in Australia are enjoying the good quality and service of our various kinds of shot blasting machines.
Pls inform us your workpiece’s dimensions and production capacity,so our engineer could recommend you with a suitable type of shot blasting machine.
Thank you!
E-mail:[email protected]

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR BRAIN?

—

ART & LIFE IN TIMES OF COGNITIVE AUTOMATION

Was a conference-festival organized by the Gerrit Rietveld Academie that took place on March 22, 23, and 24, 2016 at Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam.

Studium Generale Rietveld Academie invited André Lepecki, Melanie Bühler, and Warren Neidich to each inaugurate a discursive and performative program of one day.

March 22
Ugly Feelings: Thinking and Feeling in Contemporary Internet Culture
curated by Melanie Bühler:
How has contemporary Internet culture affected our emotional and cognitive capacities – our abilities to feel and think? Our minds, as Spinoza argued, operate first in the vague and blurry field of imagination. Here, feelings and thoughts converge before reason makes sense of them. This conference session focuses on how networked culture can be perceived as an extended field of imagination – a sticky universe of emotions and ideas – and confronts the way in which digital platforms structure and organize this space.
Recent political developments, such as Brexit and the American presidential election, suggest that online culture has effectively created an environment of filter bubbles – affirmative echo chambers of like-minded people. Algorithms are the gatekeepers of these information streams with their very own agendas. Beyond these bubbles, it’s the surprising and emotionally potent that spread the most – the more outrageous the message, the more likely it is heard. If Google is knowledge, the brain that is picked the most, what does it mean when the search engine auto-completes the sentence ‘are Jews’ with the word ‘evil’ (as recently reported in the Guardian)? Has Google, with its self-proclaimed strategy of non-interference, actually paved the way for the normalization of prejudice, rendering the illegitimate legit?
Once a story or an image has nested itself within the popular imagination, it often doesn’t seem to matter if something turns out to be wrong. Apparently, then, feelings cannot be fought with facts. Accordingly, trolling and tweeting have become more effective strategies than official, less emotional and personalized modes of address. With fake news being spread and ‘alternative facts’ being promoted, anything is open for debate – it’s all just a matter of opinion. Has the kind of pluralism that Hal Foster diagnosed for the art of the ’80s (‘footloose in time, culture and metaphor’ – anything is permitted and nothing really means anything) become the reality of our information age?
What is happening to our brain – to the collective capacity to think, feel and imagine – in this setting? How do we think with and through the technologies that wire our brains together? How is truth afforded by technology and how does it intersect with the logic of a digital economy whose very currency – attention – is located in our brains? Where do the ugly feelings come from that have been harnessed so successfully in recent Internet-driven political debates? Have we entered a new age of propaganda, a new information era that radically retools the way we think and feel? What role does art and its related discourses (such as postmodernism and pluralism) play in this setting?

With: Melanie Bühler, Hannah Barton, Jennifer Chan, Paul Feigelfeld, Daniel Keller, Elizabeth Orr, Özgür Kar and Timotheus Vermeulen